vote down
flag
tagn.wordpress.com - 1/7/2009
—
The angst of the week seems to be about Wikipedia chopping articles about MUDs because they lack verifiable sources.
For good or bad, Wikipedia is the animal it is, and its rules can be enforced rather selectively. Somebody seems to have it in for MUD history and they have the rules to back ...
raphkoster.com - 1/5/2009
—
raphkoster.com —
QBlog writes on the controversy going on over
the possible deletion of the article on Threshold MUD
. I’ve run into the fact that Wikipedia isn’t a great resource for research into the history of virtual worlds many times before; the ...
(more)
Losing MUD history
mud.wikia.com - 1/13/2009
massively.com - 1/7/2009
—
massively.com —
While many modern MMO users may never have
looked at a screen of white text on a
black background and typed "go north," multi-user dungeons, or MUDs, were the forerunners to modern graphical MMOs. Without their appeal and gameplay concepts, we ...
(more)
MUD history dissolving into the waters of time
Comments
Blog Reactions
Shifting sands: EGM and Threshold MUD
/random —
... Every end is a new beginning, I guess. I know I’m not the only one to consider the best way to preserve MUD history if Wikipedia feels that doesn’t meet their standards. If for-profit businesses are going to focus only on the bottom line, that leaves opportunities available to people who might want to focus on everything else that gamers enjoy…the history of the industry, the personalities who design amazing games and worlds for us to enjoy, the cultural impact of videogames on a generation of people, worldwide. ...
Related Content

